top of page
Search

Can Stellantis Make it Work?

We’re a little over three weeks from Stellantis’ 2026 Investor Day, which promises to answer quite a few questions (like, “What’s the future of Chrysler?”). While we wait, Reuters has talked to multiple sources indicating Stellantis has selected four core “brands that matter” to received a “material increase” to their funding. The lucky four are Jeep, Ram, Fiat, and Peugeot; the rest would become regional (or national) brands, and “build models using technology from the four core brands.”


Ram is a logical choice, given the immense profits generated by Ram trucks. Although North American-focused, the brand has slowly been expanding into Europe, South America, and the Middle East. If any brand wants a body-on-frame vehicle, that’s whose door they knock on. Jeep, too, long viewed as the Chrysler group’s crown jewels, has considerable profit potential (despite recent marketing and product missteps), and is essentially the company’s center of expertise for AWD technology.


The choice of Fiat might be perplexing to those of us in the U.S. who have seen Fiat’s presence dwindle since the launch of new 500 fifteen years ago. But sales of 1.1 million vehicles last year makes them the big dog in the Stellantis portfolio, with strong presence in Europe and South America and continued growth in the Middle East and Africa.

Peugeot is Stellantis’ best-selling brand in Europe, and was likely selected for both volume and its more mainstream positioning (compared to Citroen’s quirky designs, for example). What’s particularly interesting about Peugeot is their presence in the compact and (in the past) midsize segments, suggesting a possibility to source vehicles for the Chrysler and/or Dodge brands in North America.


An open question is the future of the STLA Large architecture, which is only used by Jeep among the four core brands. Does Jeep take ownership of this platform to help Chrysler (with the next-generation Pacifica and rumored large sedan) and Dodge (with the currently slow-selling Charger)?


Another open question is the ‘premium’ brands. ‘Premium’ has always been a somewhat difficult notion to pin down in this business; it’s not mainstream and it’s not luxury, just something a little nicer. This business is littered with brands that couldn’t quite make premium work, like Oldsmobile, Mercury, and Eagle (and, technically, even Edsel). It seems like it might be difficult to justify a cost premium for a DS, Alfa Romeo, or Lancia if they are all just slightly fancier Peugeots. Of the three, Lancia seems to have the most tenuous business case; why would you revive a brand that, until recently, was a single aging hatchback sold in a handful of countries.


Stellantis’ leadership certainly has its hands full. Let’s see what we hear next month.


 
 
 

Comments


Let's Connect

Whether it's a strategy consulting engagement, competitor assessment, speaking opportunity as guest or moderator at your event or podcast, please reach out via email, phone, or the contact form.

Email

Phone

248.212.7172

linkedin.png
youtube.png
substack.png

Contact

© 2035 by Lynch & Powell. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page